What went wrong - Eukanthos

What went wrong?

What can we do to prevent our plants from being affected by weeds and insects?
Nature does not function like humans competitively.
Insect attack.
Differences between this and other methods.
Polyculture is superior to monoculture.
Its superiority compared with other methods.
The superiority of natural mixed seeding.

The role the animals play.

What went wrong?

This article gives a clear picture of the unpleasant harsh reality of the degeneration of nature. It must be read after the main article on regeneration. In this way, by presenting first what can be done to reverse it, one can withstand reading it. It is important to realize what went wrong that is still happening and how it affects us, so that we can take the right course of action to correct it. What went wrong is due to ignorance of the right way.
And the best course of action is to support the creation of such an ecosystem as described here.

Some evidence of global degradation.
Most soils are severely degraded due to the destruction of the ecosystem by logging, grazing animals, and conventional agriculture that uses chemical fertilizers and pesticides and destroys the porous structure of the soil by plowing and rotor-tilling.

The first destructive act against nature was the plow that people unknowingly consider necessary because at an initial glance they see great results, while in the long run, it does great damage. This is because man, having deviated from his original blueprint lost knowledge of himself and focused only on his material existence and everything revolving around it, ignoring the future effects of his actions. Plowing and even worse (rotor) tilling destroy the natural structure of the soil, after some time the soil is compressed, and thus without air the roots of the plants rot with anaerobic fermentation, and the fertile soil is eroded by the rain due to the destruction of its natural cohesion, the microbial life of the soil. The beneficial worms, etc. are killed, the precious nitrogen being exposed due to the turning of the soil evaporates and all this gradually until the end, until complete destruction where not even a single weed can grow. This is also due to the accumulation of salt from the chemical fertilizers, which due to the destruction of the soil are necessary for the growth of the diseased plants that we eat, and the poisoning of soil life with agrochemicals. It has been observed that ploughed soil erodes 13 to 40 times faster than the natural rate of erosion (which occurs in bare soil of course). Already 40% of the world’s agricultural land has been severely degraded (with 75% being quite degraded). The devastation is now so great, that if this continues at the current rate, soils will not be able to grow a single blade of grass in 30 to 60 years.
Also don’t think it is virgin land if it has been cultivated in the past, even if it was 100 years ago. The topsoil is the top layer of soil with the highest concentration of organic matter and microorganisms that provide vital nutrients to plant roots. This is what our ancestors have destroyed with repeated plowing. And as in temperate climates it takes at least 100 years for 1 inch (2.5 cm) of fertile soil to form if we do not intervene, you can imagine how much work is needed to upgrade the soil quickly, even if it has not been cultivated for 100 years.
Here is an example: nothing can be done to reverse the destruction that continues to this day: An area in the Peruvian Amazon as large as Switzerland was funded by many countries to protect it from the untold destruction of farmers, loggers, and gold miners. So the army went to protect it, and after several losses, as they were shot by them hidden behind the trees, it left.
The devastation now continues at the same pace. As long as there are people on earth who destroy it in a million ways, the earth will end up cosmic dust in a nuclear holocaust. The same thing happens in the whole universe. Infinite planets are destroyed and infinite ones are created in the course of the friction of beings with matter. Nature is finite. See how many thousands of species are lost forever.
In the declining course after the ice age, the soil with the washing of trace elements from the rains gradually loses its fertility and the plants and trees become smaller, and more prone to disease until the earth is revived again in a glacial period. Along with the earth, we too followed a downward course, becoming more materialistic and selfish, losing touch with reality, nature, and the people around us. In addition, we are accelerating the degradation of nature due to wrong farming practices and destruction through fire, logging, etc.
The story of the declining course of Nature.
In the distant past, right after the Ice Age, lush nature was able to sustain humans without the need for agriculture, animal husbandry, logging, mining, etc. However, from a certain point onwards everything changed. People started following unconsciously their base impulses of the reptilian brain, their animalistic instincts without the knowledge of where these would lead them, and so they lost the paradise they were living in. Things got progressively worse, a gradual degradation for millennia in all aspects of life, including the natural environment ending up in the chaos we live in today.
Due to their decline, they had to face man-made and natural disasters, plus the fierce animals that previously lived peacefully with them. Thus, their fear of the wrath of Nature’s elements led them to overcrowd the cities to improve the adverse conditions. The next step was the destruction of Nature (through monocultures, logging, etc.) by the few for the sake of the many who lived in them. These few in their ignorance, when they cut down trees for timber, for convenience, chose the larger trees, the “souls” of the forest, and deforested them at the edges of the forest instead of selectively thinning out medium-sized trees throughout the forest. In addition, from the moment people started raising animals for consumption, they grazed them in the forests. The animals ate all the young trees, so there were no small ones to replace the big trees when they grew old and withered. Sometimes, in these dry dead forests or in the openings where there were many small dry branches from the trees that were cut, a fire was kindled by lightning. The blazing fire then dried the adjacent non-flammable forests, and after drying they burned. Then came the rains (which without trees became torrential), and without the trees to hold the fertile soil, they washed it away. Shepherds continued to graze their animals in the burned areas instead of others taking over planting trees. The small trees that sprouted were eaten, and then only hardy species like pines that goats do not prefer began to invade, and eventually, the primary ecosystem ended up becoming a meadow or a pine forest. The pine forests we admire today are the result of untold destruction. In Nature, it is unnatural for there to be only one species of tree or plant. Vast areas of great biodiversity forests have disappeared as a result of animal grazing, which would not have happened if people did not eat animals and their products. Shepherds do the same nowadays, and the Forest Department not only does nothing about it but also permits loggers to cut down large trees. They, together with the illegal loggers, and the destruction in our forests is untold. Unfortunately, in the University of Forestry, they do not study the things about ecosystems presented here. Old-growth forests are one of our best climate allies. By storing carbon, providing homes for wildlife, and defending communities from climate change (just to name a few), trees provide us with so much. These irreplaceable endangered old-growth forests are still being logged like there is no tomorrow. Nature is at the mercy of shepherds, loggers, and hunters and then the fire comes to finish off the destruction.
Since the advent of primary ecosystems, the Earth has undergone many realignments and changes. Perhaps the knowledge of how to regenerate these ecosystems has been lost due to natural disasters. Or perhaps, as man lived in them without realizing their value, there was no knowledge of how to restore them. After natural disasters, man, from being a fruit forager in a fertile ecosystem, ended up becoming a hunter, shepherd, or farmer. The immediate need for survival led him to choose this way, paying a dear price such as the gradual impoverishment of the soil and nutrient-poor food. Not only did shepherds and loggers spread destruction around, farmers too, by plowing destroyed the fertility of the soil of the former forest. So, after depleting it, in order to start with virgin soil again and repeat the process of depletion, he continued cutting the forest next to it. For the fertility to last a bit longer, he began using manure, crop rotation, and leaving the field fallow, set aside every few years. Nevertheless, he simply slowed down the destruction. These practices have evolved into the destructive agricultural and technological applications of our time (agrochemicals, plowing, etc.). Not only do we face the destruction of Nature, but our health is also at risk from poisoned food. If we add all the other repetitive “mistakes” of our technological civilization, it is no wonder why we experience a complete degradation of our physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual condition.
Here’s what happened to the Amazon and other ecosystems:
There are hardly any ecosystems left on earth like the one described here, and these are missing the fruit trees with the enlivening exotic fruits of the very far past that sustained humans when their nourishment was more etheric. As humans degenerated and became more materialistic and started eating grains and animals, they did not care anymore for these exquisite trees and they perished. So, there aren’t any so-called primary ecosystems anymore, that is, that have never been destroyed by humans or natural causes at any time in history. Those in places like the Amazon, the Darien of Panama, and in many other places where we believe that there are virgin primary forests/jungles, are the result of natural secondary forest regeneration over only a few centuries. Much of this re-growth occurred when the American Indians, due to European colonization, abandoned their fields and dramatically reduced their agricultural activities after being decimated by the colonialists. At that time, they applied better cultivation techniques. Huge areas of organic matter have been found in the jungle subsoil because they used biochar. Looking at the Amazon, it is obvious what passive restoration of secondary forests has achieved over the past 400 years. Again, of course, only the most durable species dominate, but in tropical regions, these are quite a lot. However, the original concentration of extinct species cannot be fully recovered, even after centuries of natural regeneration. Climate change, the grazing of herds of animals in forests, habitat fragmentation (creation of gaps in the intermediate zone), the loss of seed-distributing animals, and fires, act together and slow biodiversity recovery. Short-term ambitions, wrong tree planting * which is very costly and laborious, limited funding, and lack of knowledge, especially in developing countries, are serious obstacles to restoring forest biodiversity, and even more so given the devastation and burning by farmers, loggers, gold miners, and commercial mines.
* Planting one or only a few species, especially with flammable pines that burn repeatedly, also favors the provision of additional funds for repeated planting. And I think it is a well-known fact how much of this amount ends up for tree planting. It is imperative that we learn from these unfortunate events to reverse the destruction of the Earth that occurs ten times faster than its regeneration, to bring regenerative agriculture to another level to adopt some of the methods mentioned here, and even better to contribute to the regeneration of Nature in the way I propose here. Unfortunately, organic farming (which also destroys the soil if it is plowed) accounts for only 1.5% of the world’s cultivation and the remaining 98.5% is destructive chemical farming, so we are still a long way off.

Forceful acts towards nature

Bigger in nature does not mean better. Therefore, we must not “force” plants to grow and produce more, because that way they become vulnerable to insects and diseases and undermines the quality of the product even if it is bigger in size.
“Forcing” is the plowing and tilling that releases a lot of nitrogen and therefore impoverishes the soil. If I explain all the damage they do, I will fill a page. It takes thousands of years for the earth to return to what it was before without our help. THE DISASTER IS UNSPEAKABLE AND INVISIBLE
“Forcing” is also unnatural manure, blood, or bone meal that are unbalanced fertilizers as they contain excessive amounts of nitrite/nitrates, etc., and cause diseases in plants and humans. No plant in Nature grows with manure.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qt6hDgyIY6U
“Forcing” is the excessive irrigation to gain weight and volume without being healthy with the appropriate nutritional value. We must only irrigate when there is a sign of wilt in the leaves. For example, a tree that we feed and water too much to produce more and bigger fruit will be prone to disease and attract harmful insects. With a heat wave, its leaves wither, with the wind, its branches break, bio-energy and the necessary nutrients of its fruit are reduced, and instead of 200 years it will live 50. Additionally, all ground water contains salts that with too much irrigation they accumulate in the soil and damage the plants. A lot of this water also contain some mineral or another in excess that create imbalances.
Consequences of soil compaction.
Apart from all these ways that the soil is destroyed, destruction also occurs when grazing animals step on it in the meadows, especially when it rains and the soil is wet. The soil is compacted even more when it is compressed by a tractor or a heavy vehicle, causing it to lose its porous and cohesive texture. Then, with torrential rain (rain becomes torrential due to the missing of our forests), it is compressed even more and as the rain can no longer be absorbed, the erosion of the soil begins, especially on the slopes. Millions of hectares have been destroyed this way. The most that will grow in the remaining subsoil are a few weeds and small shrubs. In the case of compaction, nature has the perfect solution for soil restoration. Wild, hardy, expansive plants sprout up that farmers hate (such as quack grass and its cousins), which can very quickly cover the soil to protect it from the sun and enrich it with organic matter. As soon as a variety of plants we sow start growing, these grasses will vanish by themselves. Farmers use herbicides that kill the important microbial life in the soil.
Conclusion: Whatever we are and whatever we do, Nature will reflect it. If there is an imbalance outside, we must correct the imbalance inside and then we may find that the imbalance outside is corrected. This happens only if we have not made mistakes in the setting up of the primal ecosystem. If we did, then the imbalances are the effects of our mistakes. Then we would have to take the right course of action, learn from our mistakes and not keep repeating them until the end like the majority of humanity does. Unfortunately, there is plenty of evidence of what I am saying.
In the first place. Are we able to recognize our mistakes, learn from them and change our ways? Then we can attempt to accomplish this task of regenerating the primary nature.
From the point of view of technological progress, humanity is evolving to merge with a cyborg, the dream of most of the youth of our age. However, from another point of view, due to giving utmost importance to matter and technology, all virtues and qualities of the spirit are gradually lost. What counts is the result. Is humanity becoming increasingly deeply happy? Is the earth becoming more ecologically stable and greener? Is it reviving from the destruction of our ancestors? Are billions of animals not suffering from the knives of humans? The answer is no. On top, technology has made people believe that happiness depends on material things. That the earth’s purpose is to serve humans and it matters not if it is destroyed while serving us. Technology has already invented our future food grown in labs, so who cares?

How the fruit trees were lost from the ecosystems of the past.

The “endemic” species in today’s supposedly virgin forests are the hardy species that survived previous disasters. Some of the lost species are the delicate wild fruits that were very many in the past. Lost due to humans abandoning them, due to forest fires and the grazing of animals, and due to not being able to compete with the resistant species.
The trees with the most exquisite fruits, and nuts were what sustained man in the past. The endemic trees of the lush ecosystems supported their existence. Man in the past had an awareness of his etheric nature and was nourished by the fruits and nuts living semi-etherically so to speak. At some point he lost this awareness, he became more materialistic and as a result, he needed more substantial food. This made him turn towards meat-eating and cereal cultivation, and as in the process he destroyed the endemic trees, the delicate fruit trees could not exist anymore. The fruit trees he cultivates now cannot sustain him fully. Only in tropical countries with rich soil, no agrochemicals and 120 plus variety of fruits and nuts it is possible to live and beam with health. This has happened to me.
Here is an example of how else the delicate wild fruit trees vanished. In the square of the village Palaioi Poroi on Mount Olympus, there was a very rare, huge wild tree with delicious fruits. They cut it because its fruit, which no one ate, was soiling the square of the village! This is the mentality of the people who live in the countryside. Like another villager who was very proud that he killed a flock of very rare birds that lived in a ravine. Lesson to learn: Don’t care if humanity destroys this planet or not. Anyway, it has a transient nature. What counts is what you do, so do your best.

Why nature is on a descending course.
Man, due to having deviated greatly from his Original Blueprint, he unconsciously acts in a destructive way harming Nature meanwhile he thinks that is doing well. The harm is not only direct, it is also indirect. For instance, if in a country there are too many people who indulge in sex in a loveless overpowering way and are hot-tempered, the weather will be hot and dry. A typical example of man’s impact on nature is the following: Ethiopia, many years ago, was like paradise with great weather, lots of rain, and very lush vegetation with a great variety of fruit trees and edible plants. Some bandits killed some hermits that were living in caves of a mountain. They were maintaining the balance with their prayers. From that moment started a drought of not a single drop of rain that lasted 10 years. Everything dried up and Ethiopia became the poorest country in the world.
According to the Indian Vedic cosmology IN INFINITY we pass through cycles of creation and dissolution. A small cycle has 4 yugas (smaller cycles) of which we are now at the end of the fourth one, the kali yuga, the Age of darkness where we have lost touch with our inner selves, an age of profound ignorance. We are going towards destruction to be succeeded by the next cycle, the Satya yuga, the golden age where Truth prevails. All of this happens on different planets that also pass through cycles of creation and destruction.
A very important concept that we rarely use and most don’t know is the concept of egregore. When two or more (up to billions) persons project their similar thoughts, and beliefs (positive or negative), in the morphogenetic field, they create an entity called egregore. People’s unmeritorious acts create negative egregore entities and people’s meritorious acts create positive egregore entities. In our times the negative ones are winning over, influencing the weather patterns and the rest of the natural world, and also the sensitive people who do not have a strong positive composure. This is one of the reasons why the earth is on a descending course. Unless this is reversed, we are heading towards total destruction. In the horizon this reversal seems unlikely but one never knows! There is also not enough geomagnetic energy on earth to support the primal ecosystem in full due to the upcoming magnetic pole reversal.
I do know all of this and more, and I am aware also of the transient nature of everything including ourselves. The primary ecosystem will be a training ground for those who wish to establish again a connection with their inner selves manifesting this connection in nature by regenerating the primary ecosystem. Even if just some of us will benefit from it, is worth doing it.

The disadvantage of solid-roof greenhouses.
There are about 3 million hectares of solid-roof greenhouses worldwide. They all produce sick plants. Plant bio-energy is undermined, photosynthesis is impaired and plants do not have the vitamins and minerals they should, because plastic sheet and glass prevent the full spectrum of sunlight from reaching them. This is very serious, especially when it has to do with important supplements like spirulina that is almost pure chlorophyll. Luckily there are still places where they grow spirulina and other superfoods in the open air. Only a greenhouse with a movable roof is acceptable that opens during the day to allow the plants to receive direct sunlight.

What can we do to prevent our plants from being affected by weeds and insects?

It is very important to start on virgin soil whose bio-energy has never been disturbed and the trees and bushes have not been removed as this in itself degrades the soil.
When we disturb the balance of nature, we stimulate its survival reaction resulting in an endless battle where we manage to prevail by force and with a lot of effort, but the price is to eat poisoned or nutrient-deficient food. So if we start the battle with nature by digging the soil, after some years of intensive chemical cultivation (or some more years for organic if the plow is used), nature will be defeated where not a single weed will grow, but we will also be defeated since our plants will not grow either. This is not speculation, it has happened on millions of acres.
This is how the natural world works: When hunters kill a lot of a particular species of animal, it goes into a survival mode and multiplies like crazy. In the same way, when the soil’s bio-energy is disturbed by plowing or tilling, the weeds grow stronger and stronger and as we have disturbed and degraded the soil and use seeds of weak plants that generation after generation, for hundreds of years, they have been overprotected, over-watered and over-fertilized, even the organic ones, then what do you expect?
Even the seeds of seed banks worldwide are of very poor quality. After plowing, we continue the violence to suppress nature’s reaction by destroying weeds in various ways, believing erroneously, like the fear of snakes, that they are stealing soil substances from our plants, while these are like animals that multiply excessively due to our violence against nature.
The solution is, at the beginning with the first sowing of susceptible vegetables and plants, to apply some clever techniques, until the plants and trees of the third generation (having returned to their ancestral form), adapt with the rest and become endemic. Then they will produce fruits etc. of excellent quality and will no longer be bothered by weeds. All of them, our plants and the weeds will grow harmoniously together.
Different kinds of weeds grow depending on what is missing the soil and their purpose is to restore the balance and fertility. For instance quack grass and its cousins (pasture like creeping plant) grow to loosen the soil after it is being plowed and rototilled and consequently compacted by the rains due to having lost its natural structure. Artificial aeration with plowing or rototilling lasts until rain makes it a hardpan, and then for the next 30 to 60 years having to plow again and again until its total destruction with lots of salts from artificial fertilizers, poisons and zero organic matter. Welcome to the laboratory food!!!
Nature does not function like humans competitively.
Nature follows certain laws. Observe a tree’s branches and roots that are spread uniformly without being entangled with each other. This happens to trees and plants that grow without human intervention. The same applies to the roots of many different species that grow next to each other. There is always enough space for each leaving enough soil around it. Even if roots entangle, they do not touch each other and do not “steal” substances from each other. Instead, they help one another, as long as they are all part of a harmonious ecosystem of great biodiversity.
So, for our vulnerable plants in the beginning, before they become resistant in their third generation, one way is, instead of sowing them in pellets, we start them first in a nursery and then transplant them. On their final spot to help them to have a good start, we can cut or uproot (depending) the weeds around them to avoid too much shade. Even if weeds come up again, they will not harm our plants because they will be tall enough to cope with them.
If we have not formed paths, and the weeds, (or the ones we plant to create organic matter) are so tall that we cannot walk and prevent us from sowing the next crop, instead of cutting them, we can make a tool, a roller-crimper a closed cylinder that we fill with water to increase the weight and by pulling it, as it rolls, it flattens the plants and tilts them. The tall ones with tough stems will not stand up again.
Insect attack.
In Nature when the seeds of the wild plants fall on poor soil or if the plants are sick due to wrong cultivation practices, then harmful insects arrive to kill them. These are in fact very beneficial because their job is to eliminate in Nature anything that for some reason is not a strong plant to secure that their offspring are strong and healthy. See: “Why Insects Do Not Attack (and Cannot) Attack Healthy Plants”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnNOvA3diDU

Differences between this and other methods.

Polyculture is superior to monoculture.
In untouched Nature, there are no forests with only one or a few species of trees. In a degraded environment, in damaged soil, nothing can grow but very hardy species such as pines and meadow grasses.
A pine forest is not natural. It is the result of the destruction of nature hundreds or thousands of years ago. In soils where the forest has burned, we should first sow seeds/pellets of resistant species that add organic matter and enrich the soil and finally sow more delicate species.
In the process of imitating Nature, we do not plant a single species. We do not make monocultures or only few kinds together or plants in groups like planting only vegetables. Vegetables should have enough sun but also have other plants around them (shrubs and trees) to be fully protected. Plants that are all mixed have better health, and durability, live longer, and have many more vitamins and trace elements. If we are afraid to plant everything mixed up, we must at least apply polyculture to a certain extent like for instance do what the American Indians did in the past, plant corn with beans that climb on the corn, and squash that keeps down the weeds.
Eliminating the native trees and using poisons, traps, and tricks so that birds will not eat the fruits is the conventional way of farming. When wild fruit trees and all wild plants blend harmoniously with conventional ones, this brings great balance and there is no competition as one might think. There are other advantages too. For example, if there were trees with endemic fruits that are the preferred natural food of birds, they would not eat our fruits.
Wild trees grow without watering, manure, animal products (manure, bone meal, and blood), chemical fertilizers, and sprays. Conventional ones can grow in the same way and when we mix them with the wild ones they grow quite well without needing extra care due to attunement and communication with the wild ones through their roots and not only.
Its superiority compared with other methods.
The fertility of the soil in such an ecosystem increases year by year, unlike other methods, even the organic when it uses plowing and rototilling. With these, the soil is degraded (it just takes longer for the organic) even when the land is left fallow. This is evidenced even by the organic farmers themselves, a conclusion they draw from decades of experience. The only ones that come close to regenerating Nature are the new, lesser-known forms of agroecology, which is regenerative agroforestry, a method that combines trees with plants (and sometimes domestic animals), regenerative agriculture, which has spread widely in America, and earth therapy https://cologie.wordpress.com/.
These mimic natural processes a bit more, they are a good direction for the average farmer, but what is presented here is quite different. They focus on humans and I focus on Nature. For them monoculture with two three kinds is okay with just a bit biodiversity that mostly serves the interests of farmers who would find my system too much to follow, missing especially the “natural instinct” that it is of outmost importance in my system. All innovative crops that produce monocultures, a single crop of vegetables or cereals, etc., or in pots or hydroponics, do not take into account the geomagnetic influences, plant bio-energy, and other factors that are particularly present in an “Ecosystem” such as described here. This energy factor is very necessary for our health.
All man-made solutions are at a disadvantage and cannot function sustainably and in the long run. We, humans, are brilliant at presenting the false as true, and worst of all, our ego does not allow us to admit it when it is revealed to us. We use our minds with false evidence without looking at all the factors since most of the conventional science (as quantum has not yet been established) is incomplete. We can show that everything works well in our own way, but of course, we never show what will happen in the future when adverse conditions arise and what will happen after decades. We take advantage of the fact that changes in Nature are very slow. If conventional scientific knowledge is used to create this primary ecosystem it will fail somewhere, it will have short-term results, it will not be durable enough, it will only be pleasing to the eyes, etc. This is because it does not take into account many essential factors invisible to the limited human mind. The secrets of Nature can neither now nor will they ever be deciphered by our minds. As much as fresh cane juice differs from white sugar, natural regeneration differs from human inventions.
Bottom line: the more we act motivated by set guidelines and unilateral mental knowledge, the less success we will have in creating a self-sustaining ecosystem of great biodiversity.
The superiority of natural mixed seeding.
In organic gardening, they practice companion planting (this goes next to that and not next to the other), crop rotation (succession of plants that absorb a lot of substances from the soil with crops that replenish nutrients), mixing low plants with tall ones, and other tricks that require extensive knowledge. The method of regeneration by sowing seeds of a wide variety of plants, allows nature to decide what will grow and where, and if the elemental energy is not lacking and is enhanced by our free state reflected in nature, the result will be a very harmonious ecosystem where the plants that will grow, will cooperate instead of competing with each other. Hard to believe, but it is true.
In summary, a wide variety of plants/vegetables of different heights, growth rates, and root depths, the heavy feeders and soil-improving crops, planted with the seed/pellet method, will all grow well together, mixed up, in harmony with Nature’s wisdom that human knowledge cannot reach. Our task is just to enrich the soil and sow a wide variety of plants.

Conclusion: In anything we do, we must imitate natural processes instead of following man’s inventions even if they have a history of thousands of years. For even longer, nature has proven that “the green mantle of the earth” knows very well how to survive without the interference of man. For example, there is no wild tree on earth that grows with manure. So we don’t use manure (there is a whole book with all the reasons why not). Only the minimal quantity that trees receive from wild animals.

The role the animals play.

Wild animals are an integral part of Nature, as flora and fauna complement each other. They play a vital role in the ecosystem. Being in harmony with them, not only they will never cause us any problem, they will even approach us fearlessly. Through our interaction with them, they will invisibly enrich our subtle etheric energy. Whatever element there is in the meat that we may be missing due to eating a plant-based diet, will be replaced through biological transmutation that is favored by our attunement with the etheric forces and by the wild animals’ invisible empowerment. However to come to that point, the transition period may last months or years. Until then, as we move into living with subtle energies, even a very small amount occasionally may be enough until the biological transmutation works fully. Till then though, it would be fair to take full responsibility of your actions and kill consciously, fulfilling a survival need like the indigenous tribes. Living in such ecosystem and being with others who eat the same, it makes it easier for us to adjust sooner than later. But in no way we should make a change forcefully as this later will backfire on us.

We must also be aware that keeping animals for dairy, meat and eggs, to maintain them they require ten times more space and if we don’t kill them they quickly multiply beyond the sustaining capacity of the ecosystem. As our omnivore humanity to be fed needs ten times more space (2,5 acres) than the vegans, there is not enough land for all of us, so if the population of the earth is not reduced, we face extinction as a race unless the world turns into a plant-based diet or…adapt to eat food made in laboratories and eat insects! This is why the rulers of this world are trying desperately to find ways to lower considerably our carbon footprint. They have even set a goal by 2030 to lower it to such a degree, that the only way to reach it, is for everyone to live in smart cities and be happy with nothing. In fact creating these ecosystems will sequester a lot of carbon.

We don’t live now in an ice age where we have to survive by eating animals. Now in a world of plenty, killing them and eating their flesh, and not be like these robust Indians in a jungle, stimulates our animalistic instincts, we become more corporeal, and fractures our harmonious interaction with Nature.

As we aim for an excellent balance for humans, plants, and wildlife, carnivorous pets (that hunt wild animals) and destructive farm animals (goats, etc.) are not compatible with this ecosystem. They will bring an imbalance. Especially grazing animals degrade the soil as they need pasture, not trees. On top we don’t want to kill them. People hold erroneous beliefs thinking that because animals don’t hurt when they are killed as the butchers use painless methods, it is okay to kill them. As they are soulless themselves, they think that animals don’t have souls either that feel tremendous fear and suffering in their spirit from the horrible shock of being separated prematurely from their body. If a killing by humans happens in the ecosystem, it sends distress signals to the plants and animals around. This instills fear and puts the plants and animals in a survival mode. Humans if they take a180 degrees turn towards original nature, are capable of influencing the fauna in an amazing way. There are many examples of super healthy vegetarian dogs and cats.
If after some time we observe that certain wild animals that would bring balance to our ecosystem are missing, we bring them from elsewhere.

What went wrong?

Contents:

What can we do to prevent our plants from being affected by weeds and insects?

Differences between this and other methods.

The role the animals play.